Framework Lab — Level 100 worksheet

AIGovOps Beacon · 30-minute auditor flow Name / date: ________________________________

For each case below, fill in: who was harmed, what failed, which framework applies, which Beacon artifact would have mattered most, and which YES-act (Ship / Steady / Recover) it falls under. Bring your completed worksheet to the review session.

Case 1 — Boeing 737 MAX MCAS software fatal crashes (2018-2019)

Boeing concealed a safety-critical MCAS design change from regulators and pilots; the certification process failed to catch that the system could repeatedly command nose-down trim from erroneous sensor data.

Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Case 2 — Knight Capital deployment failure (2012)

A deployment failed to push updated code to one of eight servers. The stale code interpreted new order-routing flags as legacy commands, generating runaway orders that bankrupted the firm in less than an hour.

Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Case 3 — Detroit wrongful arrest via facial recognition (2020)

A face-recognition match produced a single candidate; police arrested Robert Williams based on that match alone. No human review, no documented thresholding, no audit trail of the model version or training data.

Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Case 4 — Apple Card credit limit bias allegations (2019)

Couples with similar finances saw very different credit limits, including in the same household. Goldman/Apple could not explain the decisions or demonstrate disparate-impact testing.

Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Case 5 — Robodebt automated welfare debt scheme (Australia, 2016-2020)

An automated income-averaging algorithm was deployed against welfare recipients without legal authority, generating false debts at scale. Operational decisions were made by automation without documented review or recourse.

Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Your case — fill in a real one from your organization

Incident / system
Year / date range
Who was harmed
What failed
Which framework(s) apply
Which Beacon artifact would have mattered most
YES-act
☐ Ship ☐ Steady ☐ Recover

Source: AIGovOps Beacon Auditor Lab Deck (30 slides) aigovopsfoundation.org · Apache-2.0